Fairness trade-offs aren’t flaws in AI—they’re the real test of our human values.
A major U.S. healthcare system rolled out a new AI-powered predictive model to prioritize patients for urgent care.
The goal: To achieve fairness by prioritizing those who needed medical help the most. However, the AI system didn't use medical needs as its key measure. It used "healthcare spending history," assuming those who spent more on care needed it more urgently.
The tragic result: Wealthier patients, who could afford frequent care, were flagged for urgent follow-up. Meanwhile, lower-income patients, who had more severe health conditions, were deprioritized because they had spent less historically.
The AI didn’t intend harm. The AI was optimized for “spending health care history" because it was the easiest data to use.
It confused spending power with medical urgency. And it left the very people who needed care the most behind.
This isn't just an AI healthcare story. The same trade-offs surface in HR recruiting, financial lending, insurance approvals, college admissions, housing access - everywhere AI is used.
When AI is involved, every decision that feels "efficient" can hide a trade-off with fairness, dignity, and human rights.
Want the Complete Guide + More?
You're only reading the introduction. The complete guide, detailed examples, and implementation steps are available inside our Skills4Good AI Academy.
Join thousands of professionals in our FREE 7-Day Starter Course and gain instant access to:
- This complete guide + other Responsible AI resources
- 7 practical lessons (only 10 minutes a day)
- Global community of professionals learning how to use AI for Good
No cost. No obligation. Just practical Responsible AI skills you can apply immediately.
